Why in the news?
- The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has assigned India a ‘C’ grade for its national accounts statistics.
- The low grading highlights critical gaps in India’s data collection, analysis, and reporting framework.
- This assessment emphasizes the urgency for India to update and improve its statistical infrastructure to ensure accurate economic monitoring and policymaking.
Background
- India maintains national accounts statistics to track key macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, GVA, investment levels, and consumer spending.
- These accounts are crucial for policy decisions, economic planning, and international credibility.
- Despite improvements, India faces persistent challenges due to outdated data methodologies and incomplete coverage of the informal sector.
Key Issues Highlighted by IMF
1. Outdated Base Years
- India’s national accounts, Index of Industrial Production (IIP), and Consumer Price Index (CPI) are based on 2011–12 as the reference year.
- Outdated base years affect:
- Accurate measurement of economic growth.
- Proper assessment of price movements in CPI.
- Effectiveness of RBI’s monetary policy.
2. Impact on Policy
- Poor data quality hampers effective policymaking.
- A ‘C’ grade indicates that India is in the same league as China in terms of national accounts data issues — a concerning position.
- Accurate data is critical for:
- Sector-specific interventions.
- Export and consumption analysis.
- Tracking investment trends.
3. Incomplete Coverage of Informal Sector
- Informal sector is largely unregistered and cash-based, making it difficult to quantify.
- Current statistics may not reflect the real size and contribution of the informal economy.
- Improved estimates would:
- Better capture population livelihood patterns.
- Offer insights into economic resilience and growth potential.
Steps Taken by the Government
Updating Base Years and Methodologies
- The government is revising base years and methodologies for:
- National accounts.
- CPI.
- IIP.
- New statistical series expected in early 2026.
- Aim: Improve accuracy, reliability, and comparability of economic data.
Integration of Sectoral Data
- MCA-21 database now used to capture corporate sector data, replacing Annual Survey of Industries.
- Proposal to include GST data in GDP estimation:
- Will improve coverage of formal sector.
- Strengthens reliability of growth estimates.
Implications of Data Deficiencies
| Aspect | Implication |
| GDP/GVA estimates | May not reflect real economic growth due to outdated base and incomplete sector coverage. |
| CPI | Cannot accurately track inflation, especially food inflation due to outdated weights. |
| Monetary policy | RBI’s policy decisions may be less effective if based on inaccurate inflation or growth data. |
| Policy interventions | Sector-specific and targeted interventions may be misguided without reliable data. |
| International credibility | Low IMF grading signals need for better data to global investors and institutions. |
Way Forward
- Prioritize accurate estimation of informal sector.
- Ensure frequent updates of base years and weights in statistical indices.
- Integrate administrative data (GST, MCA-21) into national accounts.
- Encourage technology-driven data collection and real-time monitoring.
- Continuous capacity building for statistical agencies.
Conclusion
- IMF’s grading serves as a wake-up call for India to modernize its statistical systems.
- Accurate, timely, and comprehensive national accounts are crucial for:
- Robust policymaking.
- Economic planning.
- International credibility.
- Government reforms in updating methodologies and integrating new data sources are steps in the right direction, but effective implementation is key.
Source: Data deficiencies: On India and the IMF’s low grading – The Hindu
UPSC CSE PYQ
| Year | Question |
| 2021 | Explain the difference between computing methodology of India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) before the year 2015 and after the year 2015. |